<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Applause: BBH UK&#8217;s Levi&#8217;s Print Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/</link>
	<description>lurking around the watercooler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pdub</title>
		<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/#comment-10008</link>
		<dc:creator>pdub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/?p=2180#comment-10008</guid>
		<description>uh, yeah, been there. Anyone have some old CA&#039;s around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh, yeah, been there. Anyone have some old CA&#8217;s around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uhhuh</title>
		<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/#comment-9607</link>
		<dc:creator>Uhhuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/?p=2180#comment-9607</guid>
		<description>This is cool. But yeah, it took a minute to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool. But yeah, it took a minute to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Hogan</title>
		<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/#comment-9601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/?p=2180#comment-9601</guid>
		<description>I love it.  The copy is short, simple and ohhh so sweet.   As for the images...brilliant!  The concept to sell a lifestyle rather than the product itself is something every brand is trying to do, but Levi&#039;s nailed it with very clever (very european) tact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  The copy is short, simple and ohhh so sweet.   As for the images&#8230;brilliant!  The concept to sell a lifestyle rather than the product itself is something every brand is trying to do, but Levi&#8217;s nailed it with very clever (very european) tact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/?p=2180#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>Wow, is it that hard to &#039;get&#039;? It seems academically simple to me. Got it in 1/4 of a second.

Though I do agree with &#039;t&#039; above and think the line should probably be &#039;fit in.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, is it that hard to &#8216;get&#8217;? It seems academically simple to me. Got it in 1/4 of a second.</p>
<p>Though I do agree with &#8216;t&#8217; above and think the line should probably be &#8216;fit in.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sputnik</title>
		<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/#comment-9574</link>
		<dc:creator>Sputnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/?p=2180#comment-9574</guid>
		<description>It requires a slither of imagination to figure out what&#039;s going on in the ads, which is probably why the campaign is getting positive reactions than negative ones: the people who get it, get it and like getting it (get it?)

The subjects aren&#039;t reacting to someone in Levis - everyone wears Levis. The subjects are reacting to something that doesn&#039;t fit in with their beliefs/prejudices. The Levi&#039;s brand is aligning itself with the independently minded.

It&#039;s simple, well executed and a lot more effective than the Ray-Ban campaign that tried the same approach and failed miserably. It&#039;s a step toward Levis positioning themselves as cool, but it&#039;s a really, really small step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It requires a slither of imagination to figure out what&#8217;s going on in the ads, which is probably why the campaign is getting positive reactions than negative ones: the people who get it, get it and like getting it (get it?)</p>
<p>The subjects aren&#8217;t reacting to someone in Levis &#8211; everyone wears Levis. The subjects are reacting to something that doesn&#8217;t fit in with their beliefs/prejudices. The Levi&#8217;s brand is aligning itself with the independently minded.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple, well executed and a lot more effective than the Ray-Ban campaign that tried the same approach and failed miserably. It&#8217;s a step toward Levis positioning themselves as cool, but it&#8217;s a really, really small step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/applause-bbh-uks-levis-print-ads/#comment-9567</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agencyspy.wordpress.com/?p=2180#comment-9567</guid>
		<description>i really don&#039;t get this campaign. took a lot of comment reading just to figure out the general idea (these people are staring at someone wearing levi&#039;s, who doesn&#039;t fit in). but even after getting them (i think) i don&#039;t get why they are any good. i&#039;ve seen this kind of execution a thousand times (people reacting to something that is not in the shot). the double meaning of the headline doesn&#039;t really make sense or add any value (if anything it detracts from the ad as it seems to imply the jeans don&#039;t fit well). and the executions seem pretty cliche&#039; driven. i am surprised more people aren&#039;t bashing this work, quite frankly, as we&#039;ve come to expect better from BBH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really don&#8217;t get this campaign. took a lot of comment reading just to figure out the general idea (these people are staring at someone wearing levi&#8217;s, who doesn&#8217;t fit in). but even after getting them (i think) i don&#8217;t get why they are any good. i&#8217;ve seen this kind of execution a thousand times (people reacting to something that is not in the shot). the double meaning of the headline doesn&#8217;t really make sense or add any value (if anything it detracts from the ad as it seems to imply the jeans don&#8217;t fit well). and the executions seem pretty cliche&#8217; driven. i am surprised more people aren&#8217;t bashing this work, quite frankly, as we&#8217;ve come to expect better from BBH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
